Art Blakey “Buhaina’s Delight” (1961) – updated


Official “smokin'” cover, may be played only outdoors . Also available with Nicorette Patch Edition and special Vaping Edition, suitable for smoking areas.

Updated November 2015, new photos, new text, this was first written and photographed four years ago. An update long overdue:

Track Selection: YouTube


Freddie Hubbard (tp) Curtis Fuller (tb) Wayne Shorter (ts) Cedar Walton (p) Jymie Merritt (b) Art Blakey (d) Rudy Van Gelder Studio, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, November 28, 1961 and December 18, 1961


“Buhaina’s Delight” is a reference to Art Blakey’s rarely mentioned  chosen muslim name, Abdullah Ibn Buhainia. Every one had to have one. A sextet line up, Freddie Hubbard on trumpet replacing Lee Morgan, Curtis Fuller trombone, and Cedar Walton on piano replacing Bobby Timmons. Wayne Shorter fronts on tenor sax, Jymie Merrit on bass. Different musical voices, and exciting performance. Even Henry Mancini’s “Moon River” sounds  fresh, and the interplay between Hubbard and Fuller, with Wayne Shorter’s tenor and Walton’s solid underpinning, is indeed a delight.

Vinyl:  Blue Note BNLP 4104

Mono original pressing on NY labels with “ear” and “VAN GELDER” in the runout, no deep groove either side.


Controversy alert!

Fred Cohen’s Guide to First Pressings declares this title should be Deep Groove both sides.  This copy is, however, not DG both sides. There were a variety of configurations at this  time. Pictured here is the same title with  DG Side 1 only.

4104 DGs1

Then there are other copies which are DG only Side 2, shown below.


In 1961-2 the dies which fixed stampers in place in the factory press  were being retired and  eventually replaced by dies which no longer left behind the deep groove. During the transition, numerous Blue Notes with nearby catalogue numbers are found  with deep groove on only one side, sometimes side 1, other times side 2.  Whilst Cohen provides a definitive statement for 1st pressing of each title, it becomes an article of faith that only one of these permutations is the “1st pressing”.

For some time the notion gained currency (Alan Songer) that 1st pressings at this time were favoured with the use of the new non-DG dies, and repressings used the older (presumably more-worn) DG dies. Which at this time would make the no DG issue the most likely 1st press, and mixed DG later.

There is a trade off here between intellectual purity, the need for certainty even if there is none, and the embracing of chaos, confusion and uncertainty. I’m with the last one.

Consider: if you were a grunt in the Plastylite factory in 1962, loading stampers into presses for today’s run, and there was a bucket full of dies, old and new, all of which did the same job, how likely is it that you would discriminate between them? They all did the same job, holding the stamper.

Before 1960, only DG dies were used because that is how they were all made. It’s proof of provenance.  Through  the early ’60s, with the growth in home listening and growth in record sales, more record presses installed, and more dies manufactured, to the new pattern. The old dies based on the diameter of the 78rpm record eventually disappeared.

That is  why many of the records manufactured at this time bore DG one or other side, then both, then neither. It didn’t matter. Next day another 2,000 pressings, change stampers, pick dies from bucket, different permutation.  If anything, those pressed with the fresh stamper the next day will sound better than the last few manufactured the previous day with “1st pressing” status.    So you pay your money, you make your choice.

Cover: laminated (as per Fred Cohen, a 1st cover)

Beautiful laminated cover with dimpled gloss sheen in excellent condition. Cigarette smoke adds to the period ambiance.

Improve readability notes:  LJC Super-Sharp™ (added November 2015) 4104bk-Blakey-Buhania---1920-LJC


Collectors Corner

Blakey’s Buhaina’s Delight  has been a gap in my Blue Note collection for some years. I chanced on this copy in a London store.

The one drawback, reflected in the asking price, “Good Condition” which initially led me to dismiss it . “Good” usually means not at all good, but on second thoughts I asked to see the vinyl.

I could see why how the grading was arrived at, bearing a number of prominent surface marks on both sides. However taking it to the window daylight and testing it with fingernail, it was clear the marks were entirely superficial. The maxim is “if you can feel it, you will hear it”. None of these “scratches ” were feelable, in all probability caused by skating over  a smooth spindle top and not a turntable arm needle of tracking weight 10gm . The music should be intact. Too good to pass up.

First play back home confirmed no clicks due to the marks, another win for play-grading over visual grading. A fresh lively original pressing, VG++ at a G price, a winner.


12 thoughts on “Art Blakey “Buhaina’s Delight” (1961) – updated

  1. Pingback: Art Blakey – Demo

  2. Just found a copy of this yesterday while digging in Chicago. It is DG on side one only, ear, Van Gelder stamp. Do you believe this to be first press? The copy you found looks to be DG side one only as well, correct?

    • Hi Ryan, I’m embarrassed, this was among my first posts four years ago. A lot of things have moved on in that time, the knowledge and the photo-skills, so I have taken the time to update to today standards, and added an updated opinion on the role of Deep Groove in dating pressings. Hopefully this will answer your question.

      • Thanks for clarifying the DG s1/s2 controversy. Found it next to a copy of the Big Beat that was DG side 2 only. Both were in minty condition with ear and sound beautiful so its hard to complain. Had never really listened to The Big Beat, it stands out. The Wayne Shorter composed tracks are where its at.

        I am a relatively young collector btw and appreciate and enjoy the site.

  3. Lovely one. Still on the wanting list here as well. Of course I can’t resist: what did you pay for it?? Knowing that it was presented as “G”, it must been under fifty quid?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s