Red Garland: Groovy (1956-7) UK Esquire

32-056-Red-Garland-Groovy-front-1800-LJC

Selection: C Jam Blues

Artists

Red Garland (p) Paul Chambers (b) Art Taylor (d) recorded Rudy Van Gelder Studio, Hackensack, NJ, December 14, 1956 and August 9, 1957

Music

Enter stage left, the Miles Davis Quintet rhythm section, Red Garland and Paul Chambers but the choice of drummer is the more swinging Art Taylor in preference to Philly Joe, whose trademark “kick” was perhaps thought better suited to the larger brass-led ensemble. Or may be he was busy that day.

Red’s swinging musicality is the absolute embodiment of piano accompaniment, so much so, he was destined to be the principal casualty of Miles transformation to his modal, more cool and minimalist style, for which the piano was thought too busy, too much information. Red wasn’t the one to pursue Herbie Hancock’s percussive, staccato piano solution. His hands wanted to move.

And move they do. If Miles was later to drop Garland, here, Garland drops Miles, and shows that piano can lead as well as accompany, though the emphasis remains focussed on swinging rather than Powell’s jaw-dropping virtuosity or Monk’s fiendish compositions .

Red’s rendition of the very simple yet very complex Ellingtonian “C Jam Blues” illustrates perfectly the art of playing just what is needed, nothing more and nothing less. It is so subtle an art it is easily overlooked, especially in the presence of attention grabbing lead lines from the brass. With Groovy, you can learn to listen again to the rhythm section.

Vinyl:

Esquire 32-056, first UK release of Prestige PR 7113, vinyl weight 174gm, RVG machine stamp, AB (Abbey Manufacturing)

Red-garland-groovyThe Prestige cover: what a contrast! Prestige “urban”  vs Esquire’s “urbane”: gritty graffiti vs lounge-bar. The rebellious reversed “R” in “Red” gives it a visual lift, as the second  O in GROOVY takes on the image of the vinyl disc. Neat, but to round off  the faux-underclass schtick they ought to have mis-spelt Prestige, and annoy Bob Weinstock.

On this occasion, I think the Esquire takes it on points –  more in keeping with the music inside. Now there is a novel idea…

32-056-Red-Garland-Groovy-labels-1800-LJC

32-056-Red-Garland-Groovy-rear-1800Collectors Corner

Source: Ebay

Sellers Description:

32-056-Red-Garland-Groovy-auctionresult-1800-LJC

COVER – EXCELLENT CONDITIONVINYL – GOOD CONDITION ( SURFACE MARK THAT RUNS ACROSS TRACK ONE, SIDE ONE. SOME LIGHT SURFACE MARKS, BUT NOTHING THAT AFFECTS PLAY )

Ebay under the bonnet: the second-placed bidder: The Price Setter:

Occasionally, I like to lift the bonnet and take a closer look at the competition in an eBay auction I have won – or lost. It’s always interesting to know who you are up against in pursuit of vintage vinyl, where they are coming from, their bidding style, what else is in their field of view. In the last 30 days month they placed 303 bids on 196 items, many of them vintage hi-fi components, I assume – on German Ebay..

Groovy 2nd placed Capture

Red Baron, for you the war is over: I won. But I salute an honourable opponent. Good taste.

SnoopyHD baron finalCapture

 Snoopy vs The Red Baron (1966)

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Red Garland: Groovy (1956-7) UK Esquire

  1. LJC, forgive me for going on about the “pitch” issue – but this one’s really too slow. If your Numark is still set at minus 3 percent (which we found out to be the correct speed), then something else must be wrong with it. Strange thing, because from my own experience I consider Numark quite a useful tool.

    • I have been using a strobe, which suggests more like 5% slowness rather than 3%.though I didn’t check this particular disc, which is very heavy. The Numark has a mind of its own, and it has to go before I lose mine.

      • Weight shouldn’t matter at all, except for the first fractions of a second. Again, what surprises me is that your Numark seems to differ so much in character from mine. Never mind – there are some pretty good turntables available if you want to get rid of it.

        • Over the next couple of weeks rips will still be “Numarked” but I am going to experiment with getting signal out of The Big Beast, via the pre-amp’s tape out to a laptop running Audacity . Seems a more cost-effective solution than a better USB TT.

          • No matter which way – I’ll be looking forward to any of your rips to come. I do, in fact, own most of the music you have been featuring, in varying format. But listening to rips of early pressings can revive interest in recordings that really deserve being appreciated.

    • Hello Eduard

      What do you use to ensure your record player is running at exactly 33 1/3rd? Perhaps LJC should get one of whatever you use!

      Guy

    • Hello Eduard

      What do you use to ensure your record player is exactly at 33 1/3rd? Perhaps LJC should get one, whatever it is!

      Guy

      • I use a stroboscope disc occasionally, just to check if the speed is still OK, and in fact it has always been. LJC has been using one, but I understand that his Numark is less stable speedwise than mine, so he probably would have to check the speed on each occasion. That’s all I can say.

  2. I had a copy of this Esquire, but it was “pitted”, small pits evrywhere, which sounded with a hard click. My only experience of an Esquire being of inferior quality than the US original.
    LJC claims that A.T. is more swinging than Philly Joe. I don’t agree, but think that A.T. is a better qualified piano trio player, less obtrusive than Philly Joe. A.T. made his marks during the trio recordings for Norgran with Bud Powell.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s