LJC Economics Class
It is an oft-repeated maxim that the Law of Diminishing Returns applies to Hi Fi Improvement, as everything else. It takes more and more money to yield smaller and smaller improvement.
It sounds logical, persuasive and you accept it as a price to be paid for improvement. It’s like an immutable law of Physics. A lot of our thinking, and action, is based on this sort of received wisdom, borrowed from other fields of endeavour.
The model of Diminishing Returns – a gently flattening curve between cost and improvement – has no basis in fact. The relationship applied to Hi Fi is, in my experience, entirely random. A small expenditure can make a huge difference, absolutely no difference or perversely, make things worse. A large expenditure can make a momentously huge improvement many times its expected “diminishing step”. Equally a very very expensive improvement can have a crippling effect, sending the curve plunging down instead of up.
How is this to be explained? I suspect it is because a real Hi Fi is a highly complex set of poorly understood relationships (as opposed to a “model” of how HiFi works). No-one has the time or resources to try everything, everyone’s system is different.
If outcomes are unpredictable or worse even random, no-one knows any longer knows what to do. Diminishing Returns is simply a bad model that fails to explain what happens, however everyone is very comfortable with it – both those that buy and those that sell Hi Fi – because it offers the illusion of control over outcomes in an uncertain world, in exchange for money.
Normal feelings of vulnerability in the face of uncertainty translate into fear of being exploited by tricksters, which a psychologist would recognise as a projection of people’s feeling of insecurity, not based on experience of being tricked. Few if any businesses would survive long based on “trickery”. Reading HiFi Forums you also come across a pernicious form of inverted snobbery – how cheaply something can be done and claim it is as good – buy speaker wire from d.i.y. stores – and mock”the gullible” who fall for expensive hi-fi tricksters.
Diminishing returns does apply at the extremes. At the very bottom of the quality/ price curve there is obviously garbage, at the very top, there is hi fi jewellery, cables made from rare earth metals. The 98% in between has no linear extrapolation between those two points, it is an area without any comforting maxims, which only only trial and error can reveal
Hi-fi is doubly uncertain because of unknown component inter-dependencies. Component A may be holding back the performance of component B, and both could be held back by the power to component C. You won’t hear how good A is until you fix C., but you don’t know that. You may splash out on an iconic pair of speakers, hoping for a big performance boost, but hear only a fraction of that because of the preamp you have.
Back in the early days of building my system, a friend encouraged me to try a high end wall-socket fuse. For two weeks I endured a horribly degraded sound profile, lost top-end, booming bass , until I could take no more. Many years later, after considerable fine tuning of components, that same fuse is a star performer throughout all power connectors.
Many “improvements” are unpredictable in their magnitude and can be unexpected in their direction. Most sellers will talk up benefits. Why wouldn’t they? The sales patter may be true or it may not. You don’t have to believe or disbelieve, just try it. You don’t have to know, it doesn’t help to anticipate what ought to happen – expectation bias and confirmation bias are a big problem in assessing change, and interfere with your judgement. Welcome to the world of trial and error, just listen to what happens.
I recommend you embrace the principle of uncertainty, and cultivate your own expertise at listening. Uncertainty is the substance of life. I wouldn’t want to be without it. Of that I am fairly certain.