Blue Note Records: Company History

BLUE NOTE COMPANY HISTORY: A COLLECTORS PERSPECTIVE

(Last updated May 24, 2019)

The History of Blue Note Records from a record collectors perspective, supplemented with commentary regarding audio quality, a topic on which Wiki editors and music journalists alike appear entirely oblivious.  As an independent collector with no editor or advertisers to please, I can offer opinion a little more freely, and often do.

Alfred Lion, 1939, Statement of Purpose of Blue Note Records

BlueNote Records are designed simply to serve the uncompromising expressions of hot jazz or swing, in general. Any particular style of playing which represents an authentic way of musical feeling is genuine expression. By virtue of its significance in place, time and circumstance, it possesses its own tradition, artistic standards and audience that keeps it alive. Hot jazz, therefore, is expression and communication, a musical and social manifestation, and Blue Note records are concerned with identifying its impulse, not its sensational and commercial adornments.”

The Blue Note Years (1939-1966)

Blue Note Records was established in 1939 by a German émigré from Berlin, Alfred Lion, and American musician and writer Max Margulis. Originally dedicated to recording traditional jazz and small group swing on 78rpm shellac, from 1947 the label began to switch its attention to modern jazz.

In 1951 Blue Note issued their first vinyl 10″ releases and by 1956 the label ventured into the new long-playing 12″ vinyl microgroove record field, with their accompanying sleeve cover art. Photographer Francis Wolff captured the musicians and Reid Miles the graphic design, creating iconic cover art which remains an important part of the interest of collectors.

Recording engineer Rudy Van Gelder (RVG) recorded most Blue Note releases, from 1953 until the late sixties, and his often-praised engineering skills were as important and revolutionary as the music. His recording methods were always at the leading edge, seeking out the latest models of microphone and stretching them to the limit, in both studio and live settings.

Transferring the recording from tape to acetate master with equal skill, it remained only for the Plastylite Corporation N.J. pressing plant to create what we now know to be audiophile gems. All pre-1966 Blue Notes have the Plastylite symbol “P” in the runout, apart from just one or two number of titles where, exceptionally,  requirements were supplemented by extra capacity at another plant.

Musically, Blue Note has  been associated principally with the “hard bop” style of jazz. It maintained a large roster of artists with styles ranging from bop to soul-jazz, and in its final years dabbled at the edges of emerging free jazz, with over 800 original titles released in the period up to 1966.  Between the two of them, Blue Note and its rival, Bob Weinstock’s Prestige Records, account for a huge legacy of modern jazz recordings, and its dwindling stock of original pressings, sought by collectors across the world.

The Liberty years 1966 – 1970

In 1966, Blue Note was sold to the giant Liberty Records , who maintained a modest flow of new “Blue Note” titles, including around 40 titles that had been recorded and prepared for release prior to the sale of Blue Note, whose first pressing was by Liberty. Liberty reissued most though not all titles from the Blue Note back catalogue, and some titles in stereo for the first time, miss-described as “electronically re-recorded for stereo” (simply, mastered for stereo from original two track tape)

Important for the collector,  when Liberty initially reissued Blue Note title, it supplied their own New Jersey pressing plant with Van Gelder metal parts, and any Blue Note labels and covers left over from previous pressing runs. Thus it is not uncommon to find what appear to be original (pre-1966) Blue Note records in every respect: NY labels or even earlier, Van Gelder stamp, and original Blue Note covers, but missing the signature Plastylite  “ear” in the vinyl run-out. These were mostly pressed soon after the aquisistion of Blue Note, at All Disc Records, Roselle N.J., a plant which Liberty purchased to support the aquisition. Later, Liberty went on to use its newly acquired West Coast plant, Research Craft, and a number of third party plants, as industry capacity tightened.

In 1968, Liberty Records was sold to the financial conglomerate Transamerica , who also owned United Artists (with its own music division). “Liberty Records” continued to operate under Transamerica ownership for a further two years until in 1970, when Transamerica decided to rationalise its Liberty and United Artists holdings under the United Artists Records banner, with the Blue Note and Liberty Records names retained only for marketing purposes. The import thing was ownership of the catalogue, the Blue Note trademark and music legal copyright.

The United Artists years 1970 – 1979

08-DIV-of-UTDART-segmentThe Blue Note catalogue was brought under United Artists Records Inc. management, though not without a struggle between UA and former Liberty management.  UA parted company with the classic Blue Note label design and the long-running catalogue numbering, introducing its own West Coast  branding.

Despite changing design and roster of new artists  somewhere between 1971-5, a series of classic titles from the Blue Note  catalogue were reissued on the “Division of United Artists, Inc.” label. Re-mastered by in-house UA engineers, they bear no “RVG or Van Gelder” stamp in the run-out and are remarkably fine audio quality.  A variety of engineers signatures appear in the run outs, including “Egk” and “NB. The exact date and intended market for these reissues is unclear, as many were in their original mono form.

In 1973, the “Divison of United Artists” classic label was replaced by  a new UA corporate design, the solid blue label with a black note, under the banner “United Artists Records, Inc., later to become (in 1975) the United Artists Music and Records Group”. Further reissues from the Blue Note catalogue proceeded,  some pressed with legacy stampers from the original Blue Note days, engraved with the ”VAN GELDER” machine stamp. These stampers sometimes had outlived their useful life, producing dull recordings lacking dynamic range. Given the primitive audio quality of the popular portable record player of the day, it is unlikely anyone would have noticed. Others retain the dynamic quality of original Blue Note sound.

UA’s Blue Note Division also eventually foundered, but not before licensing King Records, Tokyo Japan to reissue the Blue Note historical catalogue for the Japanese market. And also important discoveries of unissued 60’s recordings made in the Blue Note vaults and issued for the first time. To no avail,  after a brief failed management buyout (1978-9), Blue Note Records was eventually sold to giant Capitol-EMI.

The EMI years ( 1979 – present day)

EMI purchased United Artists Records in 1979, thereby acquiring the Blue Note catalogue, which lay largely dormant domestically until 1985, when it was relaunched as part of EMI Manhattan Records. EMI repeated the reissue of the Blue Note catalogue in Japan, initially through King but in 1983 replacing the King with their own subsidiary Toshiba EMI and European operations licensed its French arm  Pathe Marconi  to reissue the Blue Note catalogue.

In common with much of the industry, the EMI period was marred by industry-wide decreasing quality of vinyl pressing, culminating in the disastrous adoption of DMM (Direct Metal Mastering) technology which, contrary to its theoretical advantages, took great music and transformed it into a wooden lifeless imitation. Some people find these pressings pleasing, which does not explain why the price barely makes two figures.This affected both European releases through EMI France, and the US Capitol Manhattan label. The only exception to this dismal outcome was pressings made in Japan, where the DMM was mostly ignored and King, followed by Toshiba-EMI, reissued recordings which retained much of the glory of their original source.

More recently Blue Note became a corporate division within EMI, the Blue Note Music Group .  It has stewardship of the brand and historical assets, but has shown little inclination to leverage its most precious asset, the original tapes remaining in its vaults. In the Nineties Rudy Van Gelder was brought in to remaster recordings for their release on CD. Despite all the modern technology at their disposal, no-one has thus far been able to recreate on vinyl the extraordinary quality of those original pressings of the Fifties and Sixties, though some niche audiophile producers make claims to have.

Blue Note: a historical and cultural perspective

The corporate history of Blue Note embodies simultaneously the very best and the very worst of America.  From an entrepreneurial company with a single-tier management of founders and outstanding product quality, through a thirty year progressive decline in the hands of corporations of accounting-focussed executives with little understanding of audio production technology, matched by institutional investors with even less understanding of what they owned.

Many Blue Note albums are considered among the finest of all jazz recordings. In the awarding of special crowns for the Ninth Edition of the Penguin Guide to Jazz, eight out of 80 total are Blue Notes.In the same guide, out of its 213 recordings given status of “core collection,” 27 are on the Blue Note label.

Musically, they consist of small group improvisational jazz, played by young men mainly of Afro-American origin, not a few addicted to heroin and many who died prematurely from drug related problems or poorly controlled medical conditions. They played acoustic instruments with extraordinary ability, scratching a meagre living in a racially divided society. In the face of this adversity, truly great music was performed, and fifty or so years ago superbly recorded  by a couple of European immigrants to the US, thanks to whom we can hear this music as fresh as if it was yesterday.

A record collector perspective

Blue Note are among the most collectible records in the jazz genre, desirable as historical artifact ( “the new antiques”), audiophile gems, and sadly, as potential financial investments. Auction prices range from $20 for those artists that have not stood the test of time, through to $5,000 or more for the rarest and most desirable, of which less than a 1,000 copies were ever pressed, with the numbers surviving fifty years in excellent condition fewer still.

However these are still relatively small sums compared with the prices commanded by the detritus of punk, rock and pop, where the iron law of scarcity and obscurity dictates prices, and the very idea of audiophile quality is an oxymoron.

The Blue Note vinyl collector community is worldwide. In addition to the long-established markets of  Europe and Japan, with well-resourced collectors now in the Russian Federation and other South East Asian markets, indeed anywhere with access to eBay and a Paypal account. Elite collectors demand pristine condition and compete for the most desirable first pressings, leaving the rest of us to fantasize about the bargain found in a thrift shop and inheritances from ageing relatives, or turn for solace to the evil silver disc.

The Jazz Impresario Perspective

In the entire Blue Note catalogue, only two records in eight hundred feature or are led by a female singer. Yet concert impresarios routinely associate “jazz” with a sultry cabaret songstress in an hour-glass frock. What’s that about?

That’s show-biz for you. Whatever else it may be, it’s not Jazz.

Next: |  The Blue Note Labels

14 thoughts on “Blue Note Records: Company History

  1. Pingback: Alfred Lion and Francis Wolff: A Lifetime Love Affair with Jazz | Cinema Sojourns

  2. When did “Inc” appear on the label name on record labels?

    I have a Monk record on which it does not appear.

    • First Blue Note label to appear with ® + INC. is 4017, recorded mid-September 1959 and released in October 1959, manufacture within those dates

      Monk’s two Blue Notes (1510-11) were released in March & August 1956.

    • I don’t know about Blue Note specifically, but Atlantic printed list prices on their inner sleeves. In ’59 they were:
      $4.98 (1200-1300 Series) – $42.18 in 2018 dollars.
      $5.98 (Stereo) – $50.65 in 2018 dollars

  3. Pingback: I Hate The Grammys. -

  4. Very insightful piece. Enjoyed reading it very much. I’m going to ask this question again. Who are the quintet at the top of this page? Cheers,

    • each of the artists shown has been a leader on several recording sessions made for Blue Note and resulting for each in more than one album on this label. Moreover they were recorded each as leaders by other labels (Savoy, VeeJay, Jazz:West, Bethlehem, Columbia, Pacific Jazz, Colpix, Limelight, Riverside, U.A., Fontana, RCA (France), Jubilee, Vik, Elektra, Cadet and Atlantic). A certain Buhaina recorded even for at least 14 labels other than Blue Note.

  5. Pingback: Rudy Van Gelder: The Greatest Recording Engineer in Jazz History | Rachel Catallo

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s